Sunday, April 21, 2019

Learner Centered Assessment: Accounting for Students with Differing Abilities


     
     When I think about assessments of students with disabilities, my mind refers back to elementary school, and a girl named “Willie Mae.” She was beautiful, with big brown eyes, smart, somewhat quiet with long braided black hair and braces on her legs. She had contracted polio as a toddler. Because of her physical limitations, she was not asked to participate in many outdoor activities. But she was not exempt from the coursework. “Willie Mae’s” hands and arms had become restricted from a lack of physical therapy which made it tough for her to hold a pencil, much less to write. Fifty-five years ago there were no accommodations made; maybe educators were afraid to change their method of teaching the course materials but understand that in that era most coursework and assessments involved writing. testing, quizzes, and coursework included using her hands. So how could they have evaluated a student that has limited use of their hands and arms? An oral exam or a tape recording could have accomplished the same goal. At nine years old she had to be homeschooled, she just couldn't keep up, or so it was said at the time.
      As a regular practice, just as I did in Module 1 of my mini-course, on the first day of class, comprise a questionnaire called “Getting to Know You” including the question ‘What would you like me to know about you?’ Also, I don’t want to assume what a student can or can not do so I need to observe all my students when they are participating in classroom activities and plan various ways of participation so that no one feels excluded. The assignments in Module 1 and 2 include a skit and an interview. A learner that is limited visually, auditorily or physically could use a digital storytelling application called VoiceThread. This application will allow the student to talk, type, and draw right on the screen as well as create and share conversations around documents, snapshots, diagrams and videos that can be used collaboratively to create their skits and comprise interview questions.
     Through some reading about Universal Design I found some information about a study focused on the implementation of display technology to provide information to hearing impaired students, using Virtual Reality and  a smartphone application. These smartphone apps  were designed with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in order to help with learning of hearing impaired high school students. “The aim of using UDL in students of special needs is to provide them with suitable learning environment so that they can improve themselves to the best of their potential” (Izzo, 2012, pp. 343-350). There is no doubt in my mind that UDL has revolutionized learning.  As a potential educator in the 21st century, I want all my students to be engaged, and the course work to be accessible to a wide range of students with different needs. “Engagement is essential for the learning process, so learning how to use resources strategically towards given demands in a task can encourage resourceful, goal-driven, purposeful learning” (http://castprofessionallearning.org).
      A student may have a disability but is not disabled. Isn’t it a part of my job to make sure there is equal access to learning in the classroom? Three things that I will do make sure that my students feel included is to: treat everyone equitably, make sure that all students have full access to learning, and the tools they need and make them feel welcomed, supported, and valued as they learn. I have to be mindful that Universal Design “is” about designing course materials, content, and most important is that the instruction benefits all learners.
     We all learn and express ourselves differently.

References

CAST: Professional Learning. (n.d.). Top 10 UDL tips for assessment.Retrieved from http://castprofessionallearning.org/project/top-10-udl-tips-for-assessment/

M. V. Izzo, "Universal design for learning: enhancing achievement of students    with disabilities", Procedia Computer Science, vol. 14, pp. 343-350, 2012.

No comments:

Post a Comment